E 203. Of the 000 questionnaires sent, 45 questionnaires had been returned as either undeliverable
E 203. Of the 000 questionnaires sent, 45 questionnaires were returned as either undeliverable or the respondent was unable to fill it in for different factors. 425 dentists of 754 who had not responded to the survey following two reminders have been randomly chosen and contacted by phone in June 203 to investigate factors for nonresponse. 66 dentists couldn’t be contacted, 249 regarded as filling within the questionnaire and 0 did not want to participate. Of the 0 nonrespondents, most had no time or no longer wished to take part in surveys (42.7 and 25.5 , respectively). The remaining 3.7 found it as well complicated, was not enthusiastic about digital technologies, or had other factors to not participate. 52 on the 0 nonrespondents answered followup queries, and appeared to not use fewer digital technologies than respondents. A total of 33 dentists, out of the sample of 000 dentists, ultimately returned the questionnaire, a response price of three.three . 23 from the respondents were no longer operating in dental care, and four questionnaires were returned incomplete; these had been subsequently excluded, leaving 249 questionnaires for additional evaluation. 65. have been returned on paper and 34.9 had been completed on-line. From the respondents 57 (63. ) were male and 89 
(35.7 ) female, and of 3 respondents (.2 ) gender and age were unknown. Age ranged in between 24 and 64 years. 25 (0.0 ) on the dentists were younger than 30, 54 (2.7 ) had been 30 to 39, 50 (20. ) were 40 to 49, 82 (32.9 ) were 50 to 59 and 35 (4. ) had been 60 to 64 years old. Unpublished data in the Royal Dutch Dental Association (KNMT) for all registered dentists (aged 64 and younger) inside the Netherlands in January 202 shows that the distribution of gender and age group of thePLOS 1 DOI:0.37journal.pone.020725 March 26,6 Adoption and Use of Digital Technologies amongst Dentistssample is extremely similar to that of all registered Dutch dentists. This suggests that the sample adequately represents Dutch dental practitioners with regard to these aspects.Digital dental technologies in useThe frequencies of use of digital dental technologies are presented in Table . Digital registration of patient details may be the most frequently used technologies (93.two ). Other frequently utilised administration and communication technologies are a digital agenda (82.four ), practice internet site (82.0 ) and digital address and financial administration (80.8 ). With all the exception of practice internet sites, the majority of dentists started utilizing these technologies just before 2005. 75 of users began employing digital patient facts ahead of 2005 (median year 2000), and inside the same period 54 of those making use of a digital agenda began it (median 2004), 74 began using digital address and monetary administration systems (median 998). 5 began using a practice internet site ahead of 2005, while 56 started it after 200 (median 200). Appointments (34.four ), data screens within the waiting region (7.six ), practice supply management (6.8 ) and communication in regards to the practice by way of social media (3.two ) are utilised digitally with much less frequency, as well as the majority of dentists have began employing these during the previous 3 years. 55 of customers of digital appointments began to PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24180537 use them Doravirine site immediately after 200 (median 200), even though inside the same period 54 of customers of digital facts screens started these (median 200), 90 of those working with social media started (median 202) and 5 began utilizing digital data screens (median 200). In the clinical and diagnostic technologies, digital intra oral radiogra.
