Late ERP/APD ratios to ABBV 075 web long-term clinical outcome. We found that neither steepness of APD restitution slope nor ERP/APD ratios nor APD itself could predict long-term outcome in terms of mortality and/or appropriate ICD therapy in patients with severely impaired LV function due to ICM or DCM.RVA = right ventricular apex, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054768.tRelationship of MAP derived parameters to outcomeOf the 74 study patients, 10 (14 ) (44 of all ICD patients) received an appropriate ICD shock and 19 (26 ) died during a mean follow-up of 6.163.0 years. Thus, 29 patients (39 ) reached the combined end-point. More events occurred in patients with ICM (n = 19) than in patients with DCM (n = 10) (59 vs. 24 ; p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of APD90 restitution slope 1, APD90, and ERP/ APD90 ratio. In patients with dual-site MAP recordings, only data from the RVA were used in the outcome analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated for the entire follow-up population and for the 2 subgroups of ICM and DCM patients, respectively. However, none of these parameters predicted outcome in any of the patient groups. Figure 3A shows Kaplan-Meier curves for event-free survival according to the presence or absence of steep restitution slope S2 ( 1). No significant differences were found for restitution slopes of S2 (p = 0.79; displayed in the graph), of S3 (p = 0.59), and of S4 (p = 0.38), respectively. APD90 did not predict outcome at BCL of 600, 500, 400 and 330 ms (p = 0.69, p = 0.45, p = 0.29 and p = 0.88, respectively). Figure 3B illustrates that ERP/ APD90 ratio of S1 did not predict the combined end-point in the entire group (p = 0.57). Ratios of ERP/APD90 of S2 and S3 also were not predictive (p = 0.91 and p = 0.53, respectively). Subgroup analyses for ICM or DCM did not reveal any predictive value for APD90 restitution slope, APD90 or ERP/APD90 either. Due to the limited number of microvolt TWA tests performed in our study, differences in combined end-point occurrence between patients with negative and non-negative test results could not be determined. In contrast, positive PVS was predictive of outcome in all patients (p = 0.006) (Figure 3C) and in patients with ICM (p = 0.03) but not in patients with DCM (p = 0.48).Arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with cardiomyopathyIdentification of patients with cardiomyopathy who may MedChemExpress 548-04-9 benefit from ICD implantation is still based on impaired LV function [21]. Other contemporary risk stratifiers include TWA, ECG techniques such as signal-averaged ECG and heart rate variability, and testing of VT inducibility by means of PVS [22]. Our study reconfirmed the prognostic 23977191 value of PVS with emphasis on the subgroup of ICM patients. In the subgroup of DCM patients we did not find PVS to be predictive of events. This is perfectly in line with earlier literature demonstrating the limited prognostic value of PVS in DCM patients, while a positive PVS is well described to identify patients with ICM who are at high risk of SCD [23,24].Restitution slope ?experimental studiesIn basic EP studies, restitution slope measurements have provided a direct link to pathophysiology of malignant ventricular arrhythmias [9]. The original restitution hypothesis proposes that slopes ,1 imply electrical stability with instability otherwise (slopes .1) [9,25,26]. An important link between APD restitution and arrhythmogenesis was suspected.Late ERP/APD ratios to long-term clinical outcome. We found that neither steepness of APD restitution slope nor ERP/APD ratios nor APD itself could predict long-term outcome in terms of mortality and/or appropriate ICD therapy in patients with severely impaired LV function due to ICM or DCM.RVA = right ventricular apex, RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054768.tRelationship of MAP derived parameters to outcomeOf the 74 study patients, 10 (14 ) (44 of all ICD patients) received an appropriate ICD shock and 19 (26 ) died during a mean follow-up of 6.163.0 years. Thus, 29 patients (39 ) reached the combined end-point. More events occurred in patients with ICM (n = 19) than in patients with DCM (n = 10) (59 vs. 24 ; p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of APD90 restitution slope 1, APD90, and ERP/ APD90 ratio. In patients with dual-site MAP recordings, only data from the RVA were used in the outcome analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated for the entire follow-up population and for the 2 subgroups of ICM and DCM patients, respectively. However, none of these parameters predicted outcome in any of the patient groups. Figure 3A shows Kaplan-Meier curves for event-free survival according to the presence or absence of steep restitution slope S2 ( 1). No significant differences were found for restitution slopes of S2 (p = 0.79; displayed in the graph), of S3 (p = 0.59), and of S4 (p = 0.38), respectively. APD90 did not predict outcome at BCL of 600, 500, 400 and 330 ms (p = 0.69, p = 0.45, p = 0.29 and p = 0.88, respectively). Figure 3B illustrates that ERP/ APD90 ratio of S1 did not predict the combined end-point in the entire group (p = 0.57). Ratios of ERP/APD90 of S2 and S3 also were not predictive (p = 0.91 and p = 0.53, respectively). Subgroup analyses for ICM or DCM did not reveal any predictive value for APD90 restitution slope, APD90 or ERP/APD90 either. Due to the limited number of microvolt TWA tests performed in our study, differences in combined end-point occurrence between patients with negative and non-negative test results could not be determined. In contrast, positive PVS was predictive of outcome in all patients (p = 0.006) (Figure 3C) and in patients with ICM (p = 0.03) but not in patients with DCM (p = 0.48).Arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with cardiomyopathyIdentification of patients with cardiomyopathy who may benefit from ICD implantation is still based on impaired LV function [21]. Other contemporary risk stratifiers include TWA, ECG techniques such as signal-averaged ECG and heart rate variability, and testing of VT inducibility by means of PVS [22]. Our study reconfirmed the prognostic 23977191 value of PVS with emphasis on the subgroup of ICM patients. In the subgroup of DCM patients we did not find PVS to be predictive of events. This is perfectly in line with earlier literature demonstrating the limited prognostic value of PVS in DCM patients, while a positive PVS is well described to identify patients with ICM who are at high risk of SCD [23,24].Restitution slope ?experimental studiesIn basic EP studies, restitution slope measurements have provided a direct link to pathophysiology of malignant ventricular arrhythmias [9]. The original restitution hypothesis proposes that slopes ,1 imply electrical stability with instability otherwise (slopes .1) [9,25,26]. An important link between APD restitution and arrhythmogenesis was suspected.
