Areas, as shown in firstinsets of Figure 8b,e, suggests that the actualrespect to linear match.

Areas, as shown in firstinsets of Figure 8b,e, suggests that the actualrespect to linear match. Nonetheless, the the derivative from the parasitic -Irofulven Protocol capacitance with variation the gold pad places, as shown within the insets of Figure 8b,e, suggests that the actual variation of Cpar has growing dependence around the area of the gold pad electrodes. In this regard, the polycrystalline nature from the PZT [16,44] and PMN-PT surfaces in our case is anticipated to possess a vital function within a pronounced impact on the dispersion for smaller pads compared to bigger pad locations, exactly where an averaging on the polycrystalline effect prevails, as clearly visible around the SEM images in Figure 5c,f. Making use of the model of a parasitic capacitance, as described above, an equivalent parasitic layer is introduced to account for the variations of Cpar.Nanomaterials 2021, 11,13 ofEquation (eight) shows that the ratio of the equivalent permittivity to the equivalent thickness of this parasitic layer is straight proportional for the first derivative of your parasitic capacitance: par 1 dCpar = . (eight) 0 dA dpar The high quality on the interfacial layer below the gold pads is directly dependent around the surface roughness of the high- samples. The measurement of your actual interface roughness Share this post on: