Orresponding to P2, P8 and P10 the highest values (50), P3 and P7 had intermediate values (30 and 34) and in the other plots the values were below 10 (Table four). In the event the values of PI and PD are jointly analyzed, there is a substantial correlation involving PI and PD (Spearman correlation = 0.81; p-value= 0.0013), while the P2 showed a high PI value in relation to its PD value. Inside the study in the incidence of R. grassei, we proceeded within a equivalent way as for C. undatus. The outcomes showed that there is tiny or no incidence in the majority of the surveyed plots (Figure 3). Of the examined trees with data of R. grassei, most of them had no damages (91.7) and only 22 trees (5.8) showed galleries triggered by this species. Only in P5 and, slightly, in P10, some trees reached the low amount of infestation.Figure 3. Incidence of Reticulitermes grassei in percentage of trees per plot (P) displaying unique damage intensity.A equivalent result was obtained when analyzing the prices of Plot infestation (PI) and Percentage of damaged trees (PD), having a high correlation between each parameters (Spearman correlation = 0.99; p 0.0001). In relation Selamectin Chloride Channel towards the latter value, only in P5 additional than half in the sampled cork oaks showed termite’s lesions (Table five). All round, the harm prices were low and also the degree of incidence within the complete study area is usually classified as really low.Forests 2021, 12,9 ofTable five. Incidence of R. grassei referred towards the plot infestation index (PI), the percentage of broken cork oaks (PD) in relation for the total sampled trees and to the harm level obtained in every sampling plot (P). SD = regular deviation. Reticulitermes grassei Sampling Plot P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 PI SD 0 0 0 0.006 0.206 0.241 0.170 0 0.002 0.012 0.003 0.015 0.014 0.060 0.059 0.152 0.035 0.068 0.001 0.009 PD 0 0 0 6 68 0 2 4 8 20 25 2 Damage Level Absent Absent Absent Incredibly low Extremely low Absent Pretty low Extremely low Really low Really low Extremely low Incredibly low3.2. Collection of the Trunk Region to become Attacked by C. undatus and R. grassei The Model-1 showed substantial variations (F = 5.24; p = 0.0013) concerning the harm recorded inside the four height levels, with greater values in levels 2 and three (Table 6). The Model-2 did no obtain significant Quizartinib Apoptosis differences of the damage by C. undatus between the four solar orientations (F = 0.54; p = 0.6552) (Table six).Table 6. Quantity of damaged trees by C. undatus and their proportion in line with the 4 damaged height levels as well as the 4 orientations separately. DI = Tree Damage Intensity. SE = typical error of means. Little circumstances letter showed important variations according to the post hoc tests. No. Damaged Trees Proportion of Damaged Trees Height Level Level 1 Level two Level 3 Level 4 119 142 131 87 63.29 75.53 69.68 46.37 Orientation North South East West 119 135 119 117 63.29 71.eight 63.29 62.23 0.63 (.08) 0.70 (.09) 0.78 (.10) 0.72 (.10) 0.52 (.07) b,c 0.82 (.ten) a,b 0.95 (.12) a 0.55 (.08) c DI (Imply SE)With respect to R. grassei, the greatest proportion of lesions have been observed inside the reduced levels (1 and two) and within the south orientation (Table 7). Nevertheless, the statistical comparison was not substantial in any case.Table 7. Number of damaged trees by R. grassei and their proportion based on the 4 broken levels along with the 4 orientations separately. DI = Tree Damage Intensity. SE = regular error. No. Damaged Trees Proportion of Broken Trees Height Level Level 1 Level two Level three Level 4 15 14 eight four 68.18 63.63 36.36 18.18 0.101 (.
