Tions of structural Cynaroside msds factors describe them as distal causes of health that impact behavior and health outcomes in diffuse and indefinite ways. Rose21 posits that, because structural factors are often more removed from individual behavior, their influence on behavior is less certain and specific. Gupta et al.22 suggest that structural factors influence risk through a more extended and more variable series of causes and effects and thus have less certain and less specific influences on it. A frequently cited example of this characteristic of structural forces is the relationship between poverty and health.2,23 Although poverty impacts health outcomes, it does not “cause” any disease. This is because multiple factors and mechanisms affect how and when poverty influences healthAIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 1.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptLatkin et al.Pageoutcomes. For instance, Senegal is significantly poorer than South Africa, but HIV prevalence in Senegal is about twenty times lower than that in South Africa.24 Whereas Senegal rapidly allocated resources to tackle the HIV epidemic,25 South African leaders took several years to respond effectively.26 Thus, other factors such as public health priorities may moderate the relationship between poverty and the number of cases of HIV. Although there is relative agreement on these four characteristics of structural factors, previous models more often classify factors rather than considering how factors influence outcomes. Exceptions are a few models that differentiate the way structural levels may shape behavior. For example, Glass and McAtee2 propose that distal structural factors (such as policies on drug use or population movements) manifest themselves in health outcomes by creating conditions that regulate or shape more proximal causes of health outcomes (risk factors). However, Glass’s model does not integrate changes in individual, social, and structural factors into a system where each influences each other and the context of risk. We present a model of structural influences on HIV-related behavior that builds on previous models. Key components are integrated into a social dynamic system that emphasizes the dynamic links among structural levels and the more immediate social processes that lead to risk and prevention behaviors. Our model views individual, dyad, and structural factors as part of a system in which none function in isolation. The model also emphasizes the social aspects of structural factors on multiple levels of analyses. To reflect the likely relationships and interactive influences among structural factors and health behaviors and outcomes, we apply several key constructs from systems theory.27,28,NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptA Dynamic Social Systems Model for Considering Structural Factors in HIV Prevention and DetectionModel Overview and Assumptions The proposed model (Figure 1) includes a matrix of multilevel structural dimensions constituting attributes of the structural context, processes that represent the interaction among structural factors and between individuals and their environments, processes and attributes that occur within individuals, and specific HIV behavioral outcomes. The model organizes structural factors into six categories that may influence or be influenced at any or all of three Z-DEVD-FMK site conceptual levels. The categories involve material an.Tions of structural factors describe them as distal causes of health that impact behavior and health outcomes in diffuse and indefinite ways. Rose21 posits that, because structural factors are often more removed from individual behavior, their influence on behavior is less certain and specific. Gupta et al.22 suggest that structural factors influence risk through a more extended and more variable series of causes and effects and thus have less certain and less specific influences on it. A frequently cited example of this characteristic of structural forces is the relationship between poverty and health.2,23 Although poverty impacts health outcomes, it does not “cause” any disease. This is because multiple factors and mechanisms affect how and when poverty influences healthAIDS Behav. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 1.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptLatkin et al.Pageoutcomes. For instance, Senegal is significantly poorer than South Africa, but HIV prevalence in Senegal is about twenty times lower than that in South Africa.24 Whereas Senegal rapidly allocated resources to tackle the HIV epidemic,25 South African leaders took several years to respond effectively.26 Thus, other factors such as public health priorities may moderate the relationship between poverty and the number of cases of HIV. Although there is relative agreement on these four characteristics of structural factors, previous models more often classify factors rather than considering how factors influence outcomes. Exceptions are a few models that differentiate the way structural levels may shape behavior. For example, Glass and McAtee2 propose that distal structural factors (such as policies on drug use or population movements) manifest themselves in health outcomes by creating conditions that regulate or shape more proximal causes of health outcomes (risk factors). However, Glass’s model does not integrate changes in individual, social, and structural factors into a system where each influences each other and the context of risk. We present a model of structural influences on HIV-related behavior that builds on previous models. Key components are integrated into a social dynamic system that emphasizes the dynamic links among structural levels and the more immediate social processes that lead to risk and prevention behaviors. Our model views individual, dyad, and structural factors as part of a system in which none function in isolation. The model also emphasizes the social aspects of structural factors on multiple levels of analyses. To reflect the likely relationships and interactive influences among structural factors and health behaviors and outcomes, we apply several key constructs from systems theory.27,28,NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptA Dynamic Social Systems Model for Considering Structural Factors in HIV Prevention and DetectionModel Overview and Assumptions The proposed model (Figure 1) includes a matrix of multilevel structural dimensions constituting attributes of the structural context, processes that represent the interaction among structural factors and between individuals and their environments, processes and attributes that occur within individuals, and specific HIV behavioral outcomes. The model organizes structural factors into six categories that may influence or be influenced at any or all of three conceptual levels. The categories involve material an.
