S areola obscured by propodeum sculpture, but still evident as an impression) or, very rarely, without any definition of an areola; b) Vannal lobe margin strongly concave to almost straight, and lacking setae at midlength (if some setae are present, they are small and sparsely distributed); c) posterior edge of the scutellar disc smooth; d) vein cu-a in the hind wing not sinuate. There are other useful characters to distinguish the genus (e.g. see Mason 1981, Whitfield 1997); but the four detailed above serve well to separate the Apanteles sensu stricto JWH-133 chemical information described here from Choeras (character a), from Dolichogenidea (character b), from Exoryza (character b), from Iconella (character d), and from Illidops (character c). A total of 23 Apanteles species were previously known from Mesoamerica (Yu et al. 2012, Smith et al. 2013). After studying the type material for these taxa, 19 are retained in Apanteles sensu stricto and treated in this paper, while four species are transferred to other Microgastrinae genera. The status of the Mesoamerican species Apanteles albinervis (Cameron 1904) is revised, and one European species that is Saroglitazar Magnesium web involved in a secondary homonym with the former is transferred to Iconella. All of these nomenclatorial acts are detailed below. When the 186 new species from ACG described in this paper are included, the Apanteles fauna of Mesoamerica comprises 205 species, or about 10 times more species than previously known from that region. There was only one described species recorded from Costa Rica, 19 from Mesoamerica, 86 from the Neotropical region, and 1010 worldwide (Yu et al. 2012). This study emphasizes how much is still unknown about the diversity of parasitoid wasps in general, and Microgastrinae in particular (e.g., Rodriguez et al. 2012). It is unlikely that ACG contains 20 of the species of a global genus as widely distributed and diverse as Apanteles. A more logical explanation is that, whenever other regions are as comprehensively studied, many more undescribed species of Apanteles will be revealed. Even for ACG we are far from completing the inventory of Apanteles. We are aware of another 19 species (which would represent an additional 10 of increase for ACG), which we had to exclude because the available specimens were in poor condition and/or were only represented by males (in most cases Microgastrinae male specimens cannot be taxonomically dealt with, except through their DNA barcodes, or by inference through membership in a presumed sib group containing females, or reared from only one caterpillar). Those species are not described in this paper, although some of their interim names are provided here, for future reference, Apanteles Janzen11, Apanteles Janzen16, Apanteles Janzen34, Apanteles Rodriguez50, Apanteles Rodriguez74, Apanteles Rodriguez75, Apanteles Rodriguez79, Apanteles Rodriguez109, Apanteles Rodriguez121, Apanteles Rodriguez127, Apan-Jose L. Fernandez-Triana et al. / ZooKeys 383: 1?65 (2014)teles Rodriguez128, Apanteles Rodriguez138, Apanteles Rodriguez143, Apanteles Rodriguez149, Apanteles Rodriguez161, Apanteles Rodriguez185, Apanteles Rodriguez200, Apanteles Rodriguez216, and Apanteles Rodriguez250. Full details of these presumed species and many more can be found in the ACG database online (http:// janzen.sas.upenn.edu/caterpillars/database.lasso). We will describe these species in subsequent papers on the ACG Microgastrinae.Species formerly described as Apanteles but here excluded from the.S areola obscured by propodeum sculpture, but still evident as an impression) or, very rarely, without any definition of an areola; b) Vannal lobe margin strongly concave to almost straight, and lacking setae at midlength (if some setae are present, they are small and sparsely distributed); c) posterior edge of the scutellar disc smooth; d) vein cu-a in the hind wing not sinuate. There are other useful characters to distinguish the genus (e.g. see Mason 1981, Whitfield 1997); but the four detailed above serve well to separate the Apanteles sensu stricto described here from Choeras (character a), from Dolichogenidea (character b), from Exoryza (character b), from Iconella (character d), and from Illidops (character c). A total of 23 Apanteles species were previously known from Mesoamerica (Yu et al. 2012, Smith et al. 2013). After studying the type material for these taxa, 19 are retained in Apanteles sensu stricto and treated in this paper, while four species are transferred to other Microgastrinae genera. The status of the Mesoamerican species Apanteles albinervis (Cameron 1904) is revised, and one European species that is involved in a secondary homonym with the former is transferred to Iconella. All of these nomenclatorial acts are detailed below. When the 186 new species from ACG described in this paper are included, the Apanteles fauna of Mesoamerica comprises 205 species, or about 10 times more species than previously known from that region. There was only one described species recorded from Costa Rica, 19 from Mesoamerica, 86 from the Neotropical region, and 1010 worldwide (Yu et al. 2012). This study emphasizes how much is still unknown about the diversity of parasitoid wasps in general, and Microgastrinae in particular (e.g., Rodriguez et al. 2012). It is unlikely that ACG contains 20 of the species of a global genus as widely distributed and diverse as Apanteles. A more logical explanation is that, whenever other regions are as comprehensively studied, many more undescribed species of Apanteles will be revealed. Even for ACG we are far from completing the inventory of Apanteles. We are aware of another 19 species (which would represent an additional 10 of increase for ACG), which we had to exclude because the available specimens were in poor condition and/or were only represented by males (in most cases Microgastrinae male specimens cannot be taxonomically dealt with, except through their DNA barcodes, or by inference through membership in a presumed sib group containing females, or reared from only one caterpillar). Those species are not described in this paper, although some of their interim names are provided here, for future reference, Apanteles Janzen11, Apanteles Janzen16, Apanteles Janzen34, Apanteles Rodriguez50, Apanteles Rodriguez74, Apanteles Rodriguez75, Apanteles Rodriguez79, Apanteles Rodriguez109, Apanteles Rodriguez121, Apanteles Rodriguez127, Apan-Jose L. Fernandez-Triana et al. / ZooKeys 383: 1?65 (2014)teles Rodriguez128, Apanteles Rodriguez138, Apanteles Rodriguez143, Apanteles Rodriguez149, Apanteles Rodriguez161, Apanteles Rodriguez185, Apanteles Rodriguez200, Apanteles Rodriguez216, and Apanteles Rodriguez250. Full details of these presumed species and many more can be found in the ACG database online (http:// janzen.sas.upenn.edu/caterpillars/database.lasso). We will describe these species in subsequent papers on the ACG Microgastrinae.Species formerly described as Apanteles but here excluded from the.
