S: 11 clinical scales (somatic complaints, anxiety, anxiety-related disorders, depression, mania, paranoia, schizophrenia, borderline features, antisocial features, alcohol problems, and drug problems); 4 validity scales assessing inconsistent responding and positive or I-CBP112 web negative impression management; 5 treatment scales designed to index an individual’s appropriateness and readiness for treatment; and 2 interpersonal scales measuring relative control and warmth of a person’s interpersonal style. The validity of the PAI is well documented, with a thorough review of its convergent and discriminant validity as well as its concurrent predictive utility provided by Morey (1991). The validity scales of the PAI have been shown to effectively identify random responding as well as both positive and negative impression management (Blanchard, McGrath, Pogge, Khadivi, 2003; Morey, 1991; Peebles Moore, 1998). The present study used the short form of the PAI, which consists of the first 160 items of the full measure. The short form allows for a reliable estimation of profiles that would be obtained by the full PAI (Morey, 1991). Scale scores on the short form of the PAI areJ Pers Assess. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 21.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptCogswell et al.Pagestandardized and raw scores converted to T scores such that each scale has a mean T score of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The short form has demonstrated reasonable internal consistency (median = .76) and one-month test-retest reliability (median r = .79), as well as a median correlation of .91 with the full PAI (Morey, 1991). Morey (1991) also reported on the use of Ward’s method of analysis for the generation of typical clusters of PAI clinical scale scores. Morey (1991) reported data supporting the existence of ten empirically derived clusters, for which he provided descriptions based on each cluster’s clinical scale configuration. Although little independent research has offered support for Morey’s clusters, they nonetheless may prove useful in guiding questions to be addressed in future investigations. Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR; Paulhus, 1994)–The BIDR is a 40-item measure made up of two 20-item subscales, self-deception (SD) and impression management (IM). SD refers to the tendency to give honestly believed, but overly Thonzonium (bromide)MedChemExpress Thonzonium (bromide) favorable descriptions of oneself, whereas IM represents the tendency to give such favorable descriptions without necessarily believing them to be true. This original conception of the subscales has shifted somewhat over time, and Paulhus and John (1998) have argued that both reflect a combination of consciously and unconsciously motivated tendencies toward exaggerating two content domains: one’s self-worth or intellectual qualities (best captured by a combination of SD and IM items); or conversely, exaggerating the goodness of one’s character and adherence to social norms (best captured by IM items). Participants rated the degree to which they agreed with each statement along a 7-point Likert-type scale. Paulhus (1994) reported adequate internal consistencies for each subscale, with ‘s ranging from .65 to .75 for SD and from .75 to .80 for IM. The construct validity of the BIDR is well established, with scores consistently predicting scores on other related measures of socially desirable responding (Paulhus, 1991; 1994). Implicit Instrument Single Category Implicit Asso.S: 11 clinical scales (somatic complaints, anxiety, anxiety-related disorders, depression, mania, paranoia, schizophrenia, borderline features, antisocial features, alcohol problems, and drug problems); 4 validity scales assessing inconsistent responding and positive or negative impression management; 5 treatment scales designed to index an individual’s appropriateness and readiness for treatment; and 2 interpersonal scales measuring relative control and warmth of a person’s interpersonal style. The validity of the PAI is well documented, with a thorough review of its convergent and discriminant validity as well as its concurrent predictive utility provided by Morey (1991). The validity scales of the PAI have been shown to effectively identify random responding as well as both positive and negative impression management (Blanchard, McGrath, Pogge, Khadivi, 2003; Morey, 1991; Peebles Moore, 1998). The present study used the short form of the PAI, which consists of the first 160 items of the full measure. The short form allows for a reliable estimation of profiles that would be obtained by the full PAI (Morey, 1991). Scale scores on the short form of the PAI areJ Pers Assess. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 February 21.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptCogswell et al.Pagestandardized and raw scores converted to T scores such that each scale has a mean T score of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The short form has demonstrated reasonable internal consistency (median = .76) and one-month test-retest reliability (median r = .79), as well as a median correlation of .91 with the full PAI (Morey, 1991). Morey (1991) also reported on the use of Ward’s method of analysis for the generation of typical clusters of PAI clinical scale scores. Morey (1991) reported data supporting the existence of ten empirically derived clusters, for which he provided descriptions based on each cluster’s clinical scale configuration. Although little independent research has offered support for Morey’s clusters, they nonetheless may prove useful in guiding questions to be addressed in future investigations. Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR; Paulhus, 1994)–The BIDR is a 40-item measure made up of two 20-item subscales, self-deception (SD) and impression management (IM). SD refers to the tendency to give honestly believed, but overly favorable descriptions of oneself, whereas IM represents the tendency to give such favorable descriptions without necessarily believing them to be true. This original conception of the subscales has shifted somewhat over time, and Paulhus and John (1998) have argued that both reflect a combination of consciously and unconsciously motivated tendencies toward exaggerating two content domains: one’s self-worth or intellectual qualities (best captured by a combination of SD and IM items); or conversely, exaggerating the goodness of one’s character and adherence to social norms (best captured by IM items). Participants rated the degree to which they agreed with each statement along a 7-point Likert-type scale. Paulhus (1994) reported adequate internal consistencies for each subscale, with ‘s ranging from .65 to .75 for SD and from .75 to .80 for IM. The construct validity of the BIDR is well established, with scores consistently predicting scores on other related measures of socially desirable responding (Paulhus, 1991; 1994). Implicit Instrument Single Category Implicit Asso.
